Some people think the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
With cutting-edge invention in technology, especially in social media, according to some people, as a human beings, we are more connected than ever, while others argue that it is, in fact, making people more anti-social. In my opinion, although, to certain extent, technology has detrimental impact on real world social skills but the effectiveness of any tool lies in its users and the way they exploit it.
To begin with, technology has completely changed the face of communication and the way we connect to over loved ones. It definitely has turned the world in to a global village where establishing a connection is just a fingertip away. For example, popularity of family groups on WhatsApp is clear evidence that how much it has assisted in connecting to our relatives. In addition, platform, such as Facebook, enables user to create community groups of like-minder people who can share the ideas and take some concrete actions on real social issues. Thus, the role of science and technologies in connecting people from all over the world is crystal clear.
However, it has some downside as well due to its excessive utilization. Many youths spend most of their time social networking websites, which not only disconnect from real world but also make them more lethargic. For example, 70% of college graduates lacks social and communication skills when they apply for their first job. Moreover, due to obsession with virtual friends, rather than forming meaningful and healthy bonds with surrounding people, they believe in temporary and meaningless relationships. Consequently, we are dealing with increasing number of insensitive individuals.
In Conclusion, technology is a double-edged sword. So it is up to people how much they want to rely on it for socialization. If it effectively utilized, it is a blessing else it just a curse for mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- You went to a theater yesterday with a friend. Your friend had an accident and a staff member helped. Write to manager:•How it happened•How staff member helped•What should be done in future. 73
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college. Unfortunately because of a previous appointment you cannot come at the time they wish.Write a letter to the admissions tutor and explain your position. Apologize and 73
- Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution government should increase the tax on the petrol gasoline Would there is more benefits than the drawback 95
- Write a letter to your company that you going to training courseThis should include1)Details about the training2)How it will benefit your job3)How you arrange yourself with the schedule. 78
- Some people think that new technologies benefits the life of workers whereas some deny the statement.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'being'?
Suggestion: being
...a, according to some people, as a human beings, we are more connected than ever, while...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19601328904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04324377209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4449745129 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139265125887 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414528933185 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478063240742 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849416737497 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420325388819 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.