TECHNOLOGY: A BARRIER OR A GATEWAY TO CREATIVE IMAGINATION?
Every day dozens of articles pop up in social media regarding technology where some represent technology as a barrier to creative imagination and some portray it as a gateway to creative imagination. At first, let us know what do we mean by creative imagination. Creativity is defined as the use of imagination or original ideas to create something and Imagination is the capacity to produce images, ideas and sensations in the mind without any immediate input of the senses. Therefore, creative imagination can be outlined to create something original with the help of imagination. Technology is obviously supporting creative imagination in the fields of science, economics and many more but at the same time, it is also creating a barrier to the creative imagination in numerous fields including arts and literature.
Technology is mere a tool and the outcome of using this tool depends upon how we use it to our benefit. Misuse or improper use of it may block our imagination where Imagination is the door to possibilities. It is where creativity, ingenuity, and thinking outside the box begin for human development. In Short, Technology does not quell creative imagination, in fact, there is a great deal of evidence that suggests that technology enhances it. The world our predecessors could not even imagine is the world where we all are living at present due to the integration of creative imagination and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | kameraestout | view | |
| 2022-02-09 | ngthuy | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | rosechou | view | |
| 2021-05-31 | thuyduong2704 | 56 | view |
- TECHNOLOGY: A BARRIER OR A GATEWAY TO CREATIVE IMAGINATION? 72
- ENCOURAGING THE YOUNG GENERATION TO PURSUE ALTERNATE SKILLS: A SUCCESSFUL CAREER TIP 56
- NURTURING AND REWARDING ALL MEMBERS TO BUILD A HEALTHY SOCIETY 56
- "Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, regarding, so, therefore, as to, in fact, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13733905579 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12342575795 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1691943026 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.7 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402463897997 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140697463858 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101644379289 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285851463486 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097530506192 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.