Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not.
The routine behavior of people show most of their characteristics. For example, individuals who are always active when they are in a long vacation, it is more possible to think them as an active person in their lives. As far as being success is concerned, being organized and neat person during our task is the most important factor. Even though there are many people at the pinion that the state of someone room has any related to their important tasks and their reaching to success. But, I think, everyone wants to be success must be neat and organized their daily lives even about their room's state. These people have required agents to obtain their goal and reach success like good planner in their lives and calm and stress-free people.
In the first place, it is impossible to be organized in the way of our goals unless we are the organized person in our personal lives. If we are care about everything in our lives and manage them properly, we will be able to plan everything we must do during a day, months, years and so forth. Success is always routed in good previous planning. For example, the students who want to be top in their class, they must manage all their school task and try to do their best. It is clear crystallized if they live in a messy room which everything is always vanished, they cannot be on time about their task because they must always forage around their room for their required equipment. They lose most of their time in their lives in these ways, and accordingly they can follow their schedules.
Secondly, another important factor to gain success and be prosperous is being calm and comfortable during our tasks. Those people who live in an untidy room, when have toil or an important task, like a representation of their master thesis, they will be stressful because of the atmosphere of their room. Their mind always functions like the air of their workplace. Psychologically speaking, human beings are always affected by their environment like the room they live. For example, I used to have an untidy roommate whose room was always messy. She was in a theater group. Once day, she had to prepare for her next day play, he was much disrupted and worried because she couldn’t find her specific clothes for play. Even, she finally found her clothes after spending time, but he slept stressfully because of the tension of this event and following bad acting in her play. She wasn’t success at all in any field because of her very characteristic.
In sum, in my opinion, those people are care about the stance of their room, being neat and organized, are more likely to be success comparing with those living in an untidy and unorganized room. The neat people are able to plan about their tasks and do all of them on time which need to reach success. I also think they are calmer and more comfortable in comparison to another group. Living in a messy room make people stressful especially in crucial time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | Atrin@21 | view | |
| 2022-12-02 | wqx | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | leilapaidar | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Honey_ashr | 44 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Neshat-ygn | 73 | view |
- playing game is fun only when you win.agree or disagree? 73
- celebrities' point of view is more important for young people in comparison to older people 73
- rewarding system in companies 83
- it is important to know about all events happening aroun the world? 73
- weather or not Venus is a feasible place for a permanent human presence 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 15.1003584229 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70134874759 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50079267656 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443159922929 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5793637516 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.76 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248056219744 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077212928655 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061638618667 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170073678779 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026137851341 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.