Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is some scientific evidence showing that eating junk food could be harmful to human's health. A number of people believe that the educational programs can be effective to prevent people from eating junk food. However, this idea is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, the opponents of the educational programs as an efficient way point that because of some changes which have occurred in lifestyle recently, people tend to eat prepared food. This group indicates that the most important reason is the fast-paced life in which people have to work hard all day long, so they do not pay enough attention to food's health. Thus, the education system cannot work in this field due to the fact that the lifestyle must be changed.
By contrast, those who support producing educational programs about the risks of overeating junk food cite the various benefits. These range from raising public awareness to decrease in the illnesses rate. If people are warned about the dangers of overusing fast food, they will concern more about their health. Subsequently, individuals try to prepare homemade dishes more which are significantly healthier than prepared ones. Examples can be seen in people who have chosen vegetarianism recently because they have realized the key role of eating vegetables in healthy life via education. In addition, another argument is that when people gain more information about good nutrition, the societies face serious diseases less.
Overall, it seems obvious that although fast-paced life completely has changed the human's lifestyle, there are some effective ways to make it better. The useful Education is one of the best approaches to warn people in this case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-15 | mani223 | 87 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- An old friendis coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema. Write to your friend. In your letterExplain that you are unable to comeFind out how long your friend is stayingin townArrange a suitable time to meet 73
- You have recently ordered an item from the Internet, but are not happy with the purchase. Write to the company. In your letterDescribe what you purchasedExplain why you are not happy with the purchaseTell them what you would like them to do about the situ 87
- You recently organized an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch. Write a letter to 73
- Although more and more people read the news online, some people still use newspaper. Why do you think this is? Which one do you prefer? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...t-paced life completely has changed the humans lifestyle, there are some effective way...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20890410959 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66045198888 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9211482123 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364304379843 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119040461128 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10091731645 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220388555473 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864398722035 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.