Truth is always bitter.
Argument stated by faculty member to the president of a large university is convincing and seems properly studied with supportive points. In this challenging and emerging world with new technologies, it is required to have effective and well planned long term goals and objectives. Without having direction, it may difficult for such a large university to sustain in near future. And as faculty memeber has stated that higher education is facing the new challenges, to have clear objectives to address them is curcial.
Further, faculty member proposed to prepare and send questionnaires in order to get feedback from other faculty members as well as from students. Again it is important step for instigating such evolutionary process. As feedback is most vital part in large organization, it will be helpful to understand flaws exists in institution. In questionnaires, faculty members are asked for expection from institution and students are for how beneficial education persued from institute is. Hidden shortcoming may come into picture while evaluating received feedback and shall be focus for better further development. From feedback, what positive things are already being helpful to faculty members shall be retained or further can be ameliorated. Additionally, tenuous links or missing bridges can be accomplished or can be planned to achieve soon.
Shortcomings and provided facilities received from feedback can be tabulated for further processing. These data can be formulated in official statement stating actions for mitigatation of existing shortcoming as a part of short term and long term as well. This can be a clear mission and vision of institute and can be useful to attract more talent to their institution for persue better programs. With such pellucid mission, such large institute can withstand with proud among other educational institutes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-30 | PriteshAmrelia | 16 | view |
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects f 58
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 23
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of WLSS television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the s 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48788927336 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0451006583 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2690543187 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.