The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK.
The two charts provide information about the number of people who were able to acquire UK citizenship from year 1962 to year 2002. It also illustrate the distrubution of the immigrants' origin over the 6 year period.
Overall, there is a noticeable rise in figure for those who became British citizen during the 40 year period and most of them consist of Asians.
To begin with, in 1962, the government of the UK has granted 20,000 immigrants a citizenship. The figure then fluctuated from 35,000 in 1972 to 30,000 in 1982 and finally 50,000 in 1992. Afterwards, it increased considerably in 2002 wherein approximately 110,000 people received citizenship.
Regarding the composition of where these newly UK citizens came from, the data compared the value in year 1996 and 2002. Most of these immigrants came from Asia, which accounts for 49,000, followed by Africans and Europeans both represented at 9,000 and the least are from America and Australasia at 5,000. It should be noted as well that the figure of settlers in England increased substantially in year 2002. The number of Asians has risen to 58,000 and figure for Africans and Europeans rose dramatically to 25,000 and 27,000 respectively. However, America and Australasias' number dropped slightly to 4,000.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 73
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 87
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce garden fertilizer compost 67
- The table below shows some data regarding Australia s nursing employment and total workforce in 1987 and 2001 87
- The diagrams below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'illustrates'?
Suggestion: illustrates
...ip from year 1962 to year 2002. It also illustrate the distrubution of the immigrants orig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'immigrants'' or 'immigrant's'?
Suggestion: immigrants'; immigrant's
...also illustrate the distrubution of the immigrants origin over the 6 year period. Overa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, regarding, so, then, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16425120773 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86547146954 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3004633874 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1818181818 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896505713851 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421505994488 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681653158347 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663108790622 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649949654137 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.