material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers
Both the passage and the lecture discuss material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers. The passage claims that this material were remaining material of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix of dinosaur and provide three evidences for its claim. The professor, in the contrast, throws doubt on the passages claim and denies all of its evidences.
Firstly, the reading considers the branching channels inside the broken leg bone as hollows related to blood vessels and presence of the soft, flexible organic substance inside those channels may are the remaining of the real T.rek's blood vessels. In the contrast, the professor refutes this explanation by saying that this soft material can explain more probable by the colonization of bacteria in the death bodies of dinosaurs, in hollows and holes in their bones. In fact such soft material can be remaining of such bacteria.
Secondly, according to reading, it can be thought that the existence of spheres contained vital material of blood cells, iron, revealed by microscopically examination is the remaining of red blood cells. The professor disagrees with this too. He states that this foundation wasn’t only in dinosaur but also in other animals without the blood vessels in the same place. So this reddish materials in cannot be related to blood cells and the origin of them are from external of their bodies like reddish mineral.
Third, the passage said that collagen found during a test, but the lecture refutes this by explaining that collagen cannot remain more than one hundred thousand years. This fact makes a contradiction between this fact and the old of those fossils, 70 million years old fossil. The collagen which reveals during the test is probably from human skin when the researchers touched those bones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | nusybah | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- consulting with others or making decision alone 70
- which is more important:internet or public transportation 70
- is it significant to be known about events happening all around the world? 73
- celebrities' point of view is more important for young people in comparison to older people 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible to always be honest with your friends. 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18644067797 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58909830807 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3795984467 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201538172537 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750324509427 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129791226913 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115712592023 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837511649789 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.