The diagrams below show the problem of flooding in a UK town and two possible solutions.
The illustrations represent the issue with flooding in a certain town in UK and the two possible remedy for the said problem.
In general, there are two possible solutions to alleviate the concern when it comes to flooding in that town. However, these remedies may have disadvantage in the environment and the expenditures.
To start with, the main concern are the buildings and park around the two rivers, namely "A" and "B". When it rains, the water rises and the river overflow which cause flooding in this area. The first proposed solution is for these establishments and household area to be moved further away from the river. Relocating them will not harm the environment. however, the money that will be spent on the renovation and shifting cost a fortune.
Turning to another solution, they thought of building two dams, one dam will be built on the north of river "A" and another one on the west side of the river "B". The process would be for them to put a reservoir on each dam that will hold the water when it rains, therefore, it will not cause the water from the river to rise thus there will no need to change the location of park, houses and building that surrounds the area. This remedy will not cost that much but the downside is it is not environment-friendly and will affect the land.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-29 | likeasandwich529 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 70
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
- The table gives information about the female workforce and female managers in five countries 80
- The diagrams below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ing them will not harm the environment. however, the money that will be spent on the re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in general, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84482758621 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87469948799 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512931034483 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1609216088 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128846603779 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641481262163 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1134013355 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144387457582 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13140184757 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.