Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The growing gap between wealth and porverty in a society resulting from the development of technology advancement has raised a controvesial issue in the modern world. While some people against this opinion, i strongly believe in the negative effect of such development on societal differences.
There are several opinions that modern technology, along with the global integration, would narrow the gap between the rich and the poor, therefore provides a much sufficient living condition for the latter. For example, technological advancement, the Internet in particular, enable ones who obtain financial shortages to assess to many forms of distant didactic methods in lieu of going to educational institutions. In addition, those courses are usually free of charge, the fact that can save a significant amount of money for poor people. However, not everyone suffering from porverty has an opportunity to use the Internet as well as enough time to pursuit those courses since they often have to work on extra hours to provide for their living. In fact, it is generally clear that for most of remoted areas worldwide, where the number of poor people are majority, Internet access is heavily limited.
Furthermore, modern technology are considered to be more useful with the rich, who have abundant resources to take advantage of such advancement. Among the widely-agreed resources that help rich people approach the newest technology are money and educational level. A large sum of money allows one to possess any latest technological devices that are available, albeit being rare and remarkably expensive. In addition, that rich people have opportunities to learn at all educational levels leads to a certain fact that they will have sufficient knowledge and ability to keep up with the modern technology of the world, resulting in greater wealth as well as larger gap with poor people.
From all the aforementioned discussions, it is generally proved that despite some benefits that technology advancement provides for the poor, the gap between them and the rich will likely to widen in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | Rasadini De SIlva | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | oxfordpro111 | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | Nirav pandit | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | buihaianhmrbi | 96 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in many countries What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse and what are some of the possible solutions 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.Write at least 250 w 73
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...e rich and the poor, therefore provides a much sufficient living condition for the lat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in fact, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31437125749 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91860888363 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559880239521 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7549017038 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.916666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23134866463 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855992762647 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564020573092 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152535487784 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305637041851 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.