In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use their money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such solutions?
Increasing traffic problems, for instance overcrowding and accidents, have led government to think of imposing taxes on the private vehicle owners and utilize the same for upgrading public transport system. Taxing the private car owners is a key to developing country but there are also drawbacks to be taken into account.
Firstly, one benefit of collecting taxes from private car owners is that it prevents air pollution to a great extent. In other words, less people use the cars if there are more taxes on the personal cars. As a result, harmful gasses emitted from these vehicles become less: a step towards environment preservation. Secondly, using money collected through charging it in form of taxes can be used for the development of country. This money, for instance, can be used for improving the medical and health care facilities which are the basic requirements for a country to flourish. Moreover, it requires a lot of funds to build the transportation infrastructure. Contributing in such collections should be taken as a primary responsibility by everyone, especially by those who are availing the benefits by using their own vehicles.
On the other hand, one problem when people are forced to pay the huge amounts of money is that it burdens them financially. For example, it is very difficult to pay extra in the already expensive world. As a result, they may start compromising with their fundamental life necessities or may even turn suicidal in severe cases. A recent survey done by the times of India revealed that 23 percent of the suicides in India are done by the tensed masses under huge debts. Another issue of imposing vehicle taxes is that it leads to decrease in income for the companies manufacturing these vehicles as people prefer not to buy their products. This causes people to travel in the public transports and ultimately rush and crowds in the government machinery which makes public transportation inconvenient for travelling.
In conclusion, while paying taxes to the government may benefit society as a whole, it may lead to mental stress to those who pay it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-16 | enassar | 73 | view |
2018-09-12 | Ramandeep Dhillon | 78 | view |
- Although it is sometimes thought that machines play a significant role in easing lives of many workers, other people believe that these artificial brains have more of the detrimental effects.However, I consider that machines help masses do work efficientl 56
- in many countries, more money is spent on the transport system in the cities. In contrast, very little is spent in rural areas. what are the effects of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling there is a growing demand for more flights what problems does this have on the environment what measures could be taken 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tion to a great extent. In other words, less people use the cars if there are more t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05747126437 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90539836769 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57183908046 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0633355515 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228232689096 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684827627736 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560507874081 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133160238568 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728005329677 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.