some people consider price as most important thing to think about when buying product or service. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a belief that price plays a paramount role in the choice of both commodities and service. Albeit I agree with this argument owing to one reason, therein may lie another major factor.
Fiscal revenue appears as a reason why some people highly value the cost. In fact, because there is an income discrepancy among people, some individuals can only afford reasonable price. For example, poor people would buy eggs for breakfast, whilst those earning much would prefer sausages as well as chocolate cream. As a result, the value of products and service is potentially of significant concern due to financial statuses of people.
Nevertheless, the quality can also be integral to others while opting for commodities. In other words, most people appreciate operational capability when it comes to service, even though the cost can be huge. If the price of a refrigerator is high, the majority of people will not cast doubt upon its favourable condition; nor will they refute its prescribed guarantee for further usage. Therefore, a question arises as to will all individuals realize how pivotal the goods' qualities can be?
In conclusion, financial salary may act as a feature why products' price is considered most important. However, their quality can be an indispensable factor when buying as well.
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? 56
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution. Do you agree? 56
- some people consider price as most important thing to think about when buying product or service. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- People are living in a 'throwaway society', using things for a short time and then throwing them away.What are the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 84
- People are living in a 'throwaway society', using things for a short time and then throwing them away.What are the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with this argument owing to one reason, therein may lie another major factor. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 213.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16431924883 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79714511729 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3846063814 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198355213235 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670946779821 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475791247521 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116910604509 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039453934997 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.