Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both discuss solutions to reduce damage of glasses to wild birds. While the reading proposes three different ways to solve the issue, the professor casts doubts on the statements by claiming that these methods are not effective.
First of all, in contrast to the reading which states that one-way glass can be a possible solution because people inside can see through it while birds outside would consider it as a solid barrier and avoid it, the professor asserts that surface of one-way glass serves as a mirror and it is as bad as tranditional glass. The professor supports this point by the fact that birds do not undertstand what a mirror is, and if the reflection in the mirror is something like skies or trees, the birds would certainly fly into that.
Furthermore, another solution introduced in the reading is colorful designs on window glass with the example of painted stripes preventing the birds from runing into the glass while occupants being able to see through the openings. The lecture, however, proposes a contradicting idea that the openings are seen as holes in birds' eyes and they are likely to fly right into that. According to the professor, if the openings are small enough, birds would surely circumvent, but the room inside would become very dark.
Finally, the professor claims that an earth magnetic field is only used for navigation when birds travel long distance, which challenges the standpoint made by the author who believes that creating a manual magnetic field would be useful to guide wild brids away. Moreover, the professor uses examples of birds' travellings to illustrate this.When birds travel from cold places to warm places during winter, they would use a magnetic field to direct themselves. However, when travelling from one city to another, the distance is relative short. In this case, birds use eyes and brightness of light to navigate instead of using a magnetic field.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-03 | NIMA SAEEDI | 66 | view |
2019-12-03 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
2019-10-24 | writing0055 | 3 | view |
2019-09-05 | Aylahh | 78 | view |
2018-09-25 | yuxing11 | 85 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing.Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production 69
- 10) Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posi 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- Do You Agree or Disagree with the Following Statement: Movies and Television Have More Negative Effects Than Positive Effects on the Way Young People Behave. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...of birds travellings to illustrate this.When birds travel from cold places to warm p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01846153846 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51878434095 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3025095869 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.272727273 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5454545455 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132045921693 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537340100575 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433666937533 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944602713299 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541034884929 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.