The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie charts illustrate, how much money for USA owned children's charity has as a revenue resources and expenditure in certain year. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear from the chart, there are mainly six resources and highest was donated food and governments grant and investment income was the lowest resources. However, most significant amount of money spend for program services.
Children's charity has the total amount of various kinds of revenue sources was 53,561,580 $. At once, overwhelming majority of sources came in terms of donated food which is 86.6%. While, the average amount of donations from community contributions was 10.4% of the total sources. Program revenue and other income consists of approximately 2.2% and 0.4% respectively. Moreover, relatively similar contribution from investment income and government grant for the total revenue which is mere 0.2% .
However, the noticeable expenditure of children's charity in USA was program services ( 95.8%) in the total amount of 53,224,896 $. Furthermore, about 2.6% of money spent for fund rising and 1.6% used for management and general purpose from the total amount of money they owe.
- The graphs show the changes in spending habits of people in UK betweeon 1971 ans 2001 Write a report to a university lecture and descr8be the data 81
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes( for example, working for charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to the younger children) to what extent do you agree? 67
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Some believe it is important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- In modern days people are heavily influenced by other cultures. Is this cultural invasion a positive development or a negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of money spend for program services. Childrens charity has the total amount o...
^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$580'.
Suggestion: $580
...ous kinds of revenue sources was 53,561,580 $. At once, overwhelming majority of sour...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n terms of donated food which is 86.6%. While, the average amount of donations from c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...for the total revenue which is mere 0.2% . However, the noticeable expenditure ...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rens charity in USA was program services 95.8% in the total amount of 53,224,896 ...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$896'.
Suggestion: $896
...es 95.8% in the total amount of 53,224,896 $. Furthermore, about 2.6% of money spent...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50549450549 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84762790061 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2377365976 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0909090909 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152180952133 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594181955155 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572120010728 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11034551847 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486794403486 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.