Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy at times.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often believed that the study of history with the aid of television or film is right choice even they don't have an exact declaration. I disagree with the statement because unauthenticated information about ancestry may have a conflict and bad image to the generations.
Historical channels and cinema might emerge from someone's imagination or assertions without proof or evidence. Such an exhibition would create discrimination and controversy among the citizen. Furthermore, unethical explanations or picturization of history may mitigate the ancestor's or historians' real-time effort and hard work for the people and the nation. For instance, some real incidents of freedom fighters' life experiences are made just opposite after the cinematography.
Nevertheless, there are some benefits with the shows and creators of the movie for the upcoming generations to visualize the old scenario or situations. There are some best thrilling movies and series that exhibit some thread to the children. However, they must follow the rules and check the details are sincere. Moreover, there are many alternatives to explore history including writings of real chroniclers, monuments, and autobiographies of historians would be more beneficial than the artificial or scripted visual stories of history.
Television and flick would have more influence on people to explain history. Whereas the inaccurate narration would be harmful to the spectators, therefore real stories or living examples would be better great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ision or film is right choice even they dont have an exact declaration. I disagree w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6872246696 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15156906756 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638766519824 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4921561389 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107189386165 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036143053075 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360769031575 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564212531911 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377187268935 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.