The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket S is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The given map represents the town of Garlsdon where a new supermarket was going to be launched. The provided map gives information on two feasible areas for the supermarket.
From the map, it was clear that site 1 is placed in the country side and site 2 is centrally located in the town which is a traffic free area. Considering site1, it was near to the Hindon population who are about 10,000 people and it is also close to one of the industries of the town. Site two is available to all the nearby villages that is Brandson, Cransdon and Hindon. Cransdon has the highest population of 29,000 and is 12kms far from the second site. Bransdon with 15,000 people is nearly 16kms far from site2. Cransdon and Bransdon were on the same side to the south of the site2. While Hindon is on the west diagonal 12kms away from second area with about 10,000 population. Site two also has a railway crossing the area of the market and is totally surrounded by houses, it also has one of the industries situated to the south of the supermarket.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket S is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The graph below shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industries in some country. 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to make people recycle more is to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52127659574 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5042291074 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0137115999 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271581582133 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108518597883 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117263015599 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297954258477 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162791300054 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.