The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares the proportion of British donators belonging to various age groups in two years, 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it can be easily noticed that the vast majority of money came from donators older than 36 years old.
According to the graph, in 1990, people ranging from 18 to 25 years old contributed the least share, at just over 15%, while the figure for those who fell into 26-35 age group was double, at over 30%. However, the year 2010 saw relative drops in the figures for both age groups. Only 7% of British residents made donations, which was the lowest figure in this year. Also, the proportion of donators from 26 to 35 years old experienced a downward trend, falling to approximately 25%.
Also discernable from the graph, the vast majority of donators were older people. In 1990, over 40% of people between 36 and 50 years old made charitable donations, which was the greatest figure for this year. The number of donators falling into 51-65 and over 65 age groups were slightly lower, at 35% and 32% respectively. However, twenty years later, the trends varied among different age groups. While more people in 51-65 and over 65 age groups made donations in 2010 compared to 1990, there was a slight fall in the percentage of donators who were between 36-50 years old.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | Fenny Mahara | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | damladogan | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | MilanT | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | peeradonn | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | dutahi | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...trend, falling to approximately 25%. Also discernable from the graph, the vast ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77433628319 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36895977109 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7140395658 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0909090909 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155837588229 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071074391007 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420024862085 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102027646361 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321247432564 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.