The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of mobile phone and landline users in seven major countries.
A perusal of data indicates that most people used landlines found in Denmark, Sweden and US. While mobile phone users were higher than that of the land phone in UK, Sweden and Italy.
In terms of mobile phone calls, Italy was the on the top around 80% from all other countries. On the other hand, UK had nearly 85% mobile users. While the lowest numbers could be seen in Canada below 40%. Moreover, 70% of people used mobile phones in Germany.
On the comparison of telephone callers, figures were high in Denmark with nearly to 80%. US and Sweden individual contributed the same amount of calling which is 70% respectively while Canada has higher figures than mobile phone data which is below 70%. However, the percentage for Germany and the UK fell to 60% for landline phones.
To recapitulate, citizens of Denmark and US gave more preference of mobile phones over the landline while the people living in the UK, Italy used more landlines. Sweden had welcome both this technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Sandhu param | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | mohsenmortazavi | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 56 | view |
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents better parenting skills. To what extend do you agree? 84
- Nowadays people get married and have children after the age of 30 Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend and give your opinion? 56
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 73
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching T V To what extent do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r hand, UK had nearly 85% mobile users. While the lowest numbers could be seen in Can...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41164841924 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.777491829 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259948598297 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998216213014 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720550442568 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165184606448 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574362437607 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.