Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, there is a common belief that the allocated funds, by the government, to preserve and develop arts represent wastage of money and should be used to resolve pressing and prior concerns. I’m of the opposite view, as I believe that art shouldn’t but neglected. Firstly, this essay will discuss the fact that art can attract more tourists and secondly, how arts sustain the heritage of a country.
First of all, it’s well known that arts are a main factor in importing tourists from all over the world. In other words, when arts are given the deserved financial support, tourism sector gets ignited which will insure an overwhelming profit. With that said, this obtained profit could be used in other sectors. For example, two years ago an economic crisis took place in Lebanon. The government set a plan to address this issue. The plan main aim was to encourage tourists to visit Lebanon by putting a tremendous amount of effort to preserve and initiate new museums, exhibitions and concerts. Consequently, the outcome has significantly improved the resilient of the financial system.
Secondly, arts are considered to be a major source of entertainment by several people in the country. Most types of entertainment such as concert, exhibition, art shows, craft and movies are derived from arts. For example, people spent countless hours on watching movies and TV shows which are considered lucrative and entertaining at the same time. Exhibition and crafts offer a huge amount of activities like clay building, paper arts, painting and more.
Finally, since arts play a major role in attracting tourists and providing entertainment. For this reason, financing arts is a must and should be done in a variety of forms like museums, exhibitions, movies and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Molor-Od | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | poomoak | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | olimilove | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | lucastang00 | 61 | view |
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 73
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources To what extent do you agree 81
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fact that art can attract more tourists and secondly, how arts sustain the herit...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilding, paper arts, painting and more. Finally, since arts play a major role in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17182130584 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.819172442 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621993127148 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7659404204 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193641445596 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595063489658 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543511932261 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109891677056 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298195031622 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.