Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them?
There are various reasons why people choose to have pets: sometimes it is because they find certain animals really nice and just wish to have them; sometimes it is because they want to rescue abandoned or abused animals; and sometimes it is because they simply don’t want to feel lonely, among much more. I believe that in any case, if pets are not taken care of properly, their “owners” should not be allowed to have them.
First of all, I think that not taking proper care of a pet is equivalent to mistreating it, which is cruel. For example, people who decide to become owners of baby dogs that they know will grow up to be huge, like Great Danishes, should be required to live in a place which includes large open spaces where the dog will be able to run freely once it has grown up. Otherwise, it will grow up unhappy, without having been able to develop its physical potentials.
On the other hand, unfortunately, there are many ill people in the world who cannot lead a normal life. For instance, people who are paralyzed might find a great deal of comfort in having a pet around them, since other people cannot always provide the affection they need even if they are always near them. I believe this reason for having a pet represents a good cause. Nevertheless, when one looks at the big picture, one realizes that in a way, this would actually imply also paralyzing the animal, since what kind of care can a paralyzed person provide to an animal who needs to do plenty exercise in order to stay healthy?
To sum up, from my point of view, any person who cannot take proper care of a pet should not be allowed to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | shyamsingh08 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Kushi | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Agustinaac | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 78
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 77
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, first of all, in any case, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54362416107 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41671319773 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9533198825 50.4703680194 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.9 7.25397266985 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453849431624 0.242375264174 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15958393409 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102449114052 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2392972513 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432323802964 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.1260098522 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.