Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on TV is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages bad behaviour. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Today, contemporary vivid media demonstrates scenes of violence frequently. Due to this action hot debates appear. Debates, where one side claims that similar violence is fiction and harmless entertainment, while the opposite side is sure that such programs have a great impact on folks’ behaviour. From my point of view, videos demonstrating violence implement propagation of negative lifestyle among habitants, especially youngsters and children. But our society is full of other factors that encourage wrong behaviour.
Cruelty and violence are two of the most ubiquitous actions that make every scene of blockbusters more interesting and attractive. However, watching such programs involves range of consequences that may spoil not only viewer’s life but also those surroundings who are adjacent to him. Media in order to entertain their users provides a myriad of models of rough behavior that can be absorbed and realize in reality by plenty of impressed children. Such people under the influence of portrayed scenes initiate to practice familiar violence with the rest of dwellers. Moreover, the formers gain the sense of allowance that makes them even disobey the rules and laws. Wide spreading of violence through TV is, likewise, a generator for awakening and releasing negative emotions withe the aid of rudeness and cruelty.
To the contrary belief, the violence demonstrating by TV is not the main reason that encourages people for similar behavior. That is why it is incorrect to blame only TV for violence among youngsters or infants. Scenes with cruelty in many cases are invented by screenwriters . Thus, it can not be compared with savagery in real life. It is durable that domestic violence has a place. Because frequently the essential root for alike deviance is hidden in troubled childhood or dysfunctional familiy and media only makes all offenses manifest. Exactly owing to this reason, violence in spite of its fiction is not absolute harmless entertainment as it is supposed.
In conclusion, modern programs illustrating violence on TV screen have a significant influence on inhabitants with weak mentality who are exposed mostly. Albeit, the TV impact is exaggerated enormously because the principal cause for appearance the savage behavior is family obstacles. I hope that media will provide less violence and more cognitive programs which will become new propagation for young generation.
- Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on TV is harmless entertainment Others disagree and think that it encourages bad behaviour Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 85
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...many cases are invented by screenwriters . Thus, it can not be compared with savag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in many cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47872340426 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96868054667 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603723404255 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6557536729 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0952380952 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158228281415 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455986190827 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434548738391 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975131696578 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398506993096 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.