Science and English are the two subjects that should be compulsory in elementary school. Do you agree or disagree.
The importance of subject which was always debatable but has now become to be more controversial. The sustainable influence of subject has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on over the year. It can be said that science and English are the two subjects which are compulsory in elementary school. This essay will elaborate both the aspects which will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there is numerous reason that science and English are the subjects which help the student in carrier field but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that. As an illustration, English is an international language it uses in each field. For instance, if child go to any international country they will communicate with any one without any hesitation, and make a child image good.
Another key justification for upholding this notion that English is international language where as science have its own benefit in science field. As an illustration, in today modern era scientific technology use in many field. Thus this further proves that in all work technology are used in school, banks, all around in world.
From what we have discussed above, it can be said that the impact subjects are compulsory in school that student can get knowledge on both the subject which make the better future.
- PARENTS SHOULD BE HELD LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CHILDREN’S ACT. WHAT IS YOUR OPINION? 55
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Agree and Disagree. 55
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in western countries. According to you what are the reasons or effects and what solution can be proposed by government and invidividuals? 80
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in western countries. According to you what are the reasons or effects and what solution can be proposed by government and invidividuals? 79
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...onal country they will communicate with any one without any hesitation, and make a chil...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... that English is international language where as science have its own benefit in science...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fields'.
Suggestion: many fields
...modern era scientific technology use in many field. Thus this further proves that in all w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn era scientific technology use in many field. Thus this further proves that in ...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ientific technology use in many field. Thus this further proves that in all work te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81783129643 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2626508569 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.545454545 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237338315905 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989754515904 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138101370422 0.071462118173 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141203770138 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694610887274 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.