What are Advantages and disadvantages of mobiles?
The importance of mobiles which was always contentious has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is highly beneficial why others reject this notion. The substantial influence of waste of money has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of the above trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most predominant one's stems from the fact that mobiles phones play a vital role in human's life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that mobiles phones have become a crucial role in the contemporary era. As a well-known example, the proportion of mobile usage has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent. As a result, it is fruit for the 21st century.
However, there are some pitfalls that assumption this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of mobiles but the most alarming one is rooted that its wastage of money. Additionally, mobiles are dangerous for human’s health and environment. Hence, it is apparent why many are against mobiles phones.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that, the benefits of using mobiles instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked by either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29707112971 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86327624745 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6257600228 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125207301577 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04662746793 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391603326777 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809587269362 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389965050179 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.