The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The chart illustrates the average time to assemble cars in America in terms of four different brands (General Motor, Ford, Toyota, Honda) from the period of 1998 to 2005.
Overall, the time used to produce a vehicle for all brands decreased over time, despite fluctuations. In 1998, General Motor took the longest time to put together a vehicle, whereas Honda spent the least compared to the rest.
Over 7-year period, the producer General Motor had the greatest improve in the time spent to make a car, from 32 hours to 22 hours in 1998 and 2005 respectively. In the middle of the year 1999 and 2004, Ford and General Motor had the exact same hours in the making of a vehicle, which were approximately 29 hours and 24 hours respectively.
In 1998, Honda and Toyota spent the similar time to assemble a car, and although Honda used three hours less than Toyota to put together the vehicle in 1999, both manufacturers gradually took the exact hours that rose from 22 hours to 24 hours to produce by the year of 2001 to 2002. Despite different fluctuations between 2002 and 2005, Toyota and Honda eventually ended up spending 20 hours to make a car.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | hong02082002 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | hoathubanh | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a newcountry. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 69
- New technologies have changed the way children spendtheir free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 80
- The pie charts below show the proportion of energy produced by different sources in one country in 1985 and 2003 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69950738916 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47677949204 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6332744362 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164065833353 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920421008054 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538856538567 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117212734616 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033902099775 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.