Rembrandt is a famous...
The author and the lecturer both are about the painting known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman
in a White Bonnet. The reading passage states that the painting is not the work of the Rembrandt
whereas the lecturer suggests that the painting is the original work of the Rembrandt. The
lecturer has effectively challenged the main points mentioned in the passage by giving cogent
reasons.
First of all, according to the passage the dress of the woman in the painting is inconsistent
because of usual combination of linen cap that only servant would wear and the luxurious fur
collar that no servant could afford. However, the lecturer disputes this point by stating the
conclusion of the experts. She says the group of researcher has concluded that there was no fur
collar on the original painting, after the x-ray test and different analysis were done. She adds, the
fur collar was added after hundreds of years of the art work to increase the value of the painting.
Second, the reading passage suggests that light and shadow do not fit in the painting. On other
flip, the lecturer refutes this point by mentioning, when the researchers removed the fur collar
that were added on the top, they found that light and shadow perfectly matched as in other art of
Rembrandt. Furthermore, she states that the original painting never had woman’s face in shadow;
it is actually because of added dark fur collar.
Finally, the reading mentions that examination of the back of the painting shows the painting was
done on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Nevertheless, the lecture argues
with the author and states that when the fur collar had to be added on the top of the painting, the
size of the panel was increased. But the original painting was done with single panel and the
wood used for the panel was from the same plant which can be found in Rembrandt’s other
paintings. Hence, the painting is the original work of Rembrandt, she concludes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is the original work of the Rembrandt. The lecturer has effectively challenged th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94395280236 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56810371147 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457227138643 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8478517512 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.09492273731 513% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846476176976 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373891342557 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652718934591 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032987266432 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598217146926 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.