TPO 42
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, workers are more satisfied when they do similar tasks all day long because if they do similar tasks regularly, they could be specialized in the tasks and therefore they do them more rapidly. in addition, since my major is Agricultural Economics, I studied the economics principles of Trade theory and its applications. The Trade theory proves the efficiency of labor specialization.
First of all, the workers, whether the job is laborious or not, are the most hard-working and respectful class of societies. Many of the workers are employed in industry sections such as textile, electronics, automobile, tailoring etc. Many of the tasks of these jobs are so tedious and it may prevent them to work hard and fast. One way to make them hard more rapidly is the Labor Specialization. If the tasks would have been divided between the workers, they will be more skilled at those specific tasks and therefore they do the designated tasks more rapidly. Personally, I have had a personal experience in tailoring industry about this approach. I usually work in a tailoring manufacture during summers. In a particular summer, I woreked for a manager whose manufacture made use of this approach. He had divided the tasks between workers. Hence, each person was obliged to do some specific tasks all day long. I perceived, however, that my performance had been improved in comparison to the other summers in other manufactures because I had specialized in the work and I was working so faster than before. One of the important consequences of this approach is that the workers do not get bored anymore. They can just do specific tasks all day long by more amount of energy.
It is also beneficial for the manager, because the output of the whole system could be enhanced and the workers manufacture many more number of that commodity.
The economics theories already proved the efficiency of Labor Specialization. But what is its advantages for the workers? Clearly, if the efficiency of the work would have been increased, the manager is able to rise the wage of the workers. In fact the workers will be more satisfied by higher levels of wages and improved welfare.
All in all, I disagree with the statement because if workers do similar tasks during a day, they will not only get less bored at work, but also the output efficiency of the work process will be increased.
- TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons 66
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and detailsto support your response. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The most important way to improve people’s health is to clean the environment 3
- TPO 50Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- What are some of the qualities of a good parent? Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...nd therefore they do them more rapidly. in addition, since my major is Agricultura...
^^
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... the Labor Specialization. If the tasks would have been divided between the workers, they will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... Clearly, if the efficiency of the work would have been increased, the manager is able to rise ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90099009901 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84579413528 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455445544554 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0295913347 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351113485571 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937543981293 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13299796117 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184549736821 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13171157173 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.