If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why?
1. Find a roommate to share a room
2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy new technological devices less frequently
3. Buy cheap foods and cook home (do not often eat outside)
In my point of view, I would recommend the third option to my friend to reduce his or her living expenses because nutrition expenses not only account for a huge amount of life expenditures but also is more healthy and may avoid medicine expenditures. In addition, cheap foods and home-made foods have many advantages over the other options financially.
First of all, nowadays food and nutrition expenditures account for a huge amount of living expenses among others. The main reason for this is that foods should be consumed every day and the cost of affording for everyday essential could be remarkable. Hence, if an individual or a household tries to manage this section, they could benefit from a large scale money saving. A good way to reduce food costs is to make food at home, not going to restaurants or other places. Because frugal individuals can make healthy less expensive foods at home by buying cheap and less expensive raw materials. For example, my brother, who lives in Boston alone, usually make food at home by providing raw materials and enjoys his own recipe and save lots of money. This is especially profitable for him and the other households who have limited financial resources.
Second, consuming healthy food that is made of hygienic materials at home may lead to general appropriate health conditions. Many fast foods may contain some unhealthy materials that would, in long-run, force the consumer to visit a doctor. This unfavorable diet may increase the medical treats and drugs costs which the person should pay. So, if households try to make healthy cheap foods in their home, they not only guarantee their health conditions but also may reduce the cost of medical affairs.
Finally, in comparison to the other options, cheap foods may reduce the living costs more than every other decision or policy. As I mentioned before, food should be consumed every day and reducing the food costs could be more effective in the whole economy of households than the other options. For example, dorm sharing may reduce the cost of living up to 300 hundred dollars per month. By contrast, if the household makes food at home, they may save such an amount just in a week. So, making food at home may reduce the costs four times as much as sharing a dorm or house rent. In addition, if an individual usually changes his mobile so often, they can sale the previous mobile device which can make up for the cost of a new device. Also, changing a mobile device may occur occasionally, for example within 1 to 3 years, and cannot be as expensive as buying luxury food outside of home within such a time period.
All in all, I think making food at home and not having expensive meals outside could be the most efficient way to reduce the cost of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | zmz | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | bijan54 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | Mostafalp | 73 | view |
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend which of the following will you choose Why 1 Find a roommate to share a room 2 Do not buy the latest mobile phone Buy new technological devices less frequently 3 Buy cheap foods and 67
- Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- In your country, is there more need for land to be left in its natural conditions or is there more need for land to be developed for housing and industry? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 51Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utrition expenditures account for a huge amount of living expenses among others. ...
^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls can make healthy less expensive foods at home by buying cheap and less expensi...
^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sources. Second, consuming healthy food that is made of hygienic materials at ho...
^^
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...er month. By contrast, if the household makes food at home, they may save such an amo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, third, for example, i think, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77291666667 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49185391576 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0497000272 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.095238095 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19019567128 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675472406274 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449619147896 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11436538217 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461906686856 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.