The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
People differ greatly in their views about the measurement to address environment-related problems. While acquiescing in the idea that raising the price of fuel may combat some environmental issues, I would contend that this policy is far from the best remedy to mitigate the deterioration of the environment in general.
On the one hand, there are two compelling reasons as to why I concede that increasing fuel cost is one way to tackle some environmental degradation problems. First and foremost, making the price of fuel more expensive may curtail the air pollution. This is because this activity can discourage people from the use of private vehicles which can lead to diminishing the amount of traffic fumes polluting the air. Furthermore, selling fuel at higher prices may solve the problems of global warming. To explain, both individuals and businesses tend to minimize fuel consumption when fuel cost rises, therefore curb the considerable amount of greenhouse gases which cause an increase in the overall temperature of the atmosphere.
I would, on the other hand, firmly convince that the aforementioned measure must not be considered a holistic approach to address environmental problems. The primary reason is that raising fuel price cannot combat a wide range of other the deterioration. To be specific, higher fuel cost cannot stop overfishing, overhunting, and deforestation from happening. In addition, the environment-related problems can be alleviated by taking better actions. An illustration of this is that if mass producing domestics and industrial equipment use environmentally-friendly technology, including solar cells or electronic motor engines, carbon emissions can be reduced.
To sum up, although acknowledging the global warming can be solved by increasing the price of fuel, I would argue that this is not the best way to tackle the environmental degradation issues because it is not a comprehensive resolution and there have been other more effective solutions to ameliorate the deterioration of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-23 | trituong42 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 67
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes, carbon emissions can be reduced. To sum up, although acknowledging the gl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in general, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53650793651 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.480891219 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5177799051 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.153846154 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222953471985 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077241914904 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618570377221 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139117879114 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563947365353 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.