In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this practice?
Given the significant bearing of the budget management skills on the public's life today, the beneficial and detrimental effects associated with expending money in the form of cash is under lively debate. The following paragraphs will, succinctly, outline its benefits and drawbacks.
Looked at the positive aspects, spending such a way may ultimately gives rise to either inconsiderate or future-jeopardizing shopping patterns. This alarming trend seems to be due in part to the fact that spenders would not only act economically but also squander unwisely. By way of illustration, according to a recent study conducted by UCLA, the faculty of business, people tend to lose profit in large measure. In addition, hardly ever are unsuspecting individuals acutely aware of the undesirable consequences entailed. Thus, it will have engendered the loss of financial assets, if not savings for a rainy day.
From the perspective of the contemporary economists, the generous incomes most of these people earn from their remunerative employments can, nonetheless, lead to an elevated as well as impressive lifestyle. As there appears an accelerating tendency towards material hoarding, accumulation, and abundance. For a well-known example, it is the opulent and flamboyant manners of many a celebrity, including Alex, which can be aptly cited. Furthermore, not appreciating the genuine value of the monetary gains, the generality of adults commonly fritter away the riches acquired. Hence, both disquieting and bleak future await them in times to come.
In sum, notwithstanding the merits of expenses covered primarily by tools except for credit cards, cold and hard cash has proven to destroy the capital infusion. Should the members of society act more judiciously in terms of expenditure, the odds are that they will benefit considerably in personal and financial affairs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | English time | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | komalpreetsingh | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | armanarman | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | Arashrostamipteacademicmaterials | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | Arashrostamipteacademicmaterials | 11 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 77
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
... of the budget management skills on the publics life today, the beneficial and detrimen...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expenditure, the odds are that they will benefit considerably in personal and fin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, except for, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57839721254 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20373754342 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.721254355401 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.26626937 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0641736567315 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156955953459 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229574787134 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0339107696096 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306763393382 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.