TPO 29-Edmontpsaurus migration
The speaker and the passage discuss the hypothesis of surviving a spicific dinasours during ice age. Although the passage claims that there are pieces of evidence which proof the surviving of the Edmontpsaurus by migration to the sout, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that since the weather was so cold the plants could not grow on those time; therefore, these dinasour had to migrate to south due to depending their life on the plants. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that on those time the weather was more warmer and sunshine was emitted twenty-four hours at the peak of the summer. As a result, the condition for plants growing was well and these dinasours had a lot of nutrients food of plants which had been died through the ice age.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that finding many edmontosaur's skeletons prove that they lived in herd; thus, they moving in herd to coordinating their migration, the speaker argues that animals in herd do not always migrate. She also adds that by being in herd, animals can protect themseleves from the predators. For instance, despite the rosvelt elks in south of united state are in herd, they do not migrate.
Finally, although the passage says that these specific dinasours had the ability to run fast and migrating on a long distances, the professor disagrees by mentioning that the adult edmontpsaurs are capable to run fast. However, the juveniles could not run as fast as their adults. Since they could not left the juvenile behind, due to the reason that they could not survive without adults, these dinasours could not migrate to the south.
- TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 71
- TPO28-Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past 73
- TPO17- decreasing the birds population 80
- TPO30-‘burning mirror’ 73
- TPO 44-Suspicious coins 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
...t as their adults. Since they could not left the juvenile behind, due to the reason ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91836734694 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48744359344 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.651189953 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244321911253 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876728229474 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409481586093 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132705340295 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326128712341 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.