TPO 26-The treat of zebra mussel
The lecture and the passsage discuss the treat of some shellfishes for the fishes habbitat. Although the passage claims that the invasion of the shellfishes are a serious threaten for the fish populations, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that the human transportation was guilty for this invasion due to the reason that this shellfish can stick to bottom of the fish and transfer to another habitat, which it happend in early ninetheenth century and this shellfish were transported to eastern europe. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that since in this century the knowledge has increased there are number of ways to control these shellfishes. By implanting this ways, the shellfishes cannot attach to the bottom of the ships. He also adds that the salt water would kill this animal; therefore they cannot transfer by the ships anymore and colonize all of the america.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that this creatures can be dominant in every habbitat and they have not serious predator, the speaker argues that it is true that this animal can be exlusive in a habbitat. However, this might happen at the beginning of their life due to the reason that after somewhile there would be no food and they should change their habbitat.
Finally, although the passage says that this animal eat planktons which are a vital food for the surviving of the fishes, the professor disagrees by mentioning that despite the fact that this animal has negative impacts, they provide some nutrients which are useful for the fishes. As a result, fishes would not confront with the depelation of the foods.
Through the reasons which have been described above, the passage claims are rejected by the professor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | PRACHI DAVE | 73 | view |
- TPO25-Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
- TPO32-Odd sounds 80
- TPO33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 71
- Do u agree or disagree? People today spend much more time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like rather than doing things they should do. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ontrol these shellfishes. By implanting this ways, the shellfishes cannot attach to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nsfer by the ships anymore and colonize all of the america. Furthermore, unlike the pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e, unlike the passage which states that this creatures can be dominant in every habb...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and they should change their habbitat. Finally, although the passage says that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04262295082 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51872855825 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501639344262 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9938840482 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.818181818 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178371818037 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716597455718 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392720262651 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957797264585 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411918384578 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.