Compare 2 table about information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in 5 European countries
The two table demonstrate data about the amount of money spent on Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas of five European nations in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, both coffee and bananas showed a substantial increment in sales after the 5-year period. In addition, the UK was the biggest buyer of coffee and bananas in 2004, with Switzerland placed second.
In 1999, the amount of money spent on coffee was relatively low. Switzerland is the largest buyer of this Fairtrade product with 3 million euros spent while Denmark, UK, Belgium, and Sweden sales were at 1.8, 1.5, 1, 0.8 respectively. However, the year 2004 experienced a huge increment in coffee sales with UK became the largest buyer by spending 18.5 million more and Switzerland doubled their sales figure in 1999. On the other hand, Denmark, Belgium, and the amount of money that Sweden spent on coffee were almost unchanged in 2004.
Bananas definitely have a faster rate of development in five years. Only in 1999, the UK already paid 15 million euros for exported bananas while the numbers of the others were under 2 million. Despite that only Belgium and Sweden paid insignificantly less in 2004 than 1999, the amount of money spent on importing bananas in 2004 has increased greatly. The UK showed a large change from 1999 by adding 32 million euros to the sales figure while Switzerland increment has raised their figure from 1 to 5.5 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | lydia231232 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | thai1491 | 61 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Line graph: https://imgur.com/a/Eh2mMhu 73
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- the diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- two tables about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries in 1994 and 2004 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95358649789 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64294043609 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497890295359 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5259384556 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.727272727 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293435986535 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124813447946 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108183197603 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226159655011 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130308672908 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.