children less creative than they were in the past because technology
Undoubtedly technology plays has an important aspect in the society. Technology has simplified people´s lives, including children´s lives. In the past, the access of education was harsh than today, so children learned a few by their own. I disagree that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past because technology has opened a broaden ways of knowledge.
Firstly, technology offers many educational entertainment programs for children. By having access to internet or TV programs, it is possible to find out programs for increasing intellectual activities. For example, it can be used to play games for developing intellectual skill, for example puzzle, or chess. Moreover, there are a lot of webpages available for learning artistic subjects, such as playing an instrument, painting, or learning to dance. In addition, children can learn a second language using technological tools. Therefore, with the correct choose of programs, children can improve their learning skills at the same time they develop creativity.
Second, technology plays a role on searching information. Nowadays, many available apps are made for looking for answers; without any reading knowledge. One example is Siri of Iphone company, which is a mobil application that makes its online research and gives an answer when people ask for question. For speaking to Siri, it is needed only to press an icon on the phone. My nephew is six years old, he barely knows to read some words, but he ask to Siri his doubts about the traffic, geography or any particular interest. This, and many apps, help children to solve their doubts at the same time they learn.
Finally, children are accustomed to using technological devices and the access to internet is part of their lives. When they grow up it is easier for them to manage more complex machines, which is part of the today´s globalized world, without any implication of restricting creative skills.
In conclusion, technology has made self- taught children who can look for solution. Nowadays, children are faster learner than in the past thanks to many devices available for them to use. At the same time, technology is part of the children´s lives and it could be a value media to enhance creative skills without create rocket scientist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Julie.Zhu | 80 | view |
- children less creative than they were in the past because technology 78
- Reading only literature 80
- literature 3
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the pass. 70
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Whichone of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s governmentto take to protect the environment.1. Fund the research to develop environmentally frie 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the past because technology has opened a broaden ways of knowledge. Firstly, technolog...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asks'.
Suggestion: asks
...barely knows to read some words, but he ask to Siri his doubts about the traffic, g...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24258760108 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93172503158 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6050152828 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.619047619 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316822053665 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101623872191 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141830675713 0.0737576698707 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20744642682 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170135727571 0.0645574589148 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.