The charts below show the reasons for travel and the main issues for the traveling public in the us in 2009

Essay topics:

The charts below show the reasons for travel and the main issues for the traveling public in the us in 2009

The first chart illustrates why people travel while the second chart compares the primary problems which can occur when using public transportations in 2009.

Overall, as it can be highlighted from the graph that a majority of people traveled to and from work, a minority visited friends and relatives. The price of travel stood for the main reason preventing people from using it while space for pedestrians stood for the least.

Beside from travelling from and to work , people also traveled for personal reasons, which was about 19%. A higher proportion of reason was devoted to shopping compared to travel for social and recreation, 16% and 10% respectively.

When using public transportations, people were likely to be worried about safety. Other problems which contributed to the concerns of users were the agressive drivers and the highway congestion ( 17% and 14% respectively). However, the percentage of access to public transport was 2 times less than that in highway congestion , only about 8%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-11 Jann 89 view
2020-04-07 islam.elhadidy2018@gmail.com 84 view
2019-01-07 quynh nhu 78 view
Essays by user quynh nhu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Beside from travelling from and to work , people also traveled for personal reaso...
^^
Line 8, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssive drivers and the highway congestion 17% and 14% respectively. However, the p...
^^
Line 8, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mes less than that in highway congestion , only about 8%.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86265846801 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0383189014 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318466525429 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134008955254 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108876444222 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19139488074 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946557918439 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.