The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the traveling public in the US in 2009.
The given bar chart below depicts why US residents travel, while another chart gives information about the six problems that travelers would experience in 2009.
Overall, it is obvious that the main reason for travel was to and from work, while the figure for visiting friends or relatives was the lowest during the period. Regarding the pie chart, the price of travel became the largest issue for the travelling public, whereas the problem of pedestrian spaces was not negligible in 2009.
49% of travelers in the survey travel in search of work, followed by personal reasons (19%) . At the same time, the percentage of people shopping was about 16%, which was more than twice as many as that of those who chose to visit friends and relatives (6%). Only 10% of tourists enjoyed traveling as social and recreational activities.
With regard to problems, it is clear that the percentage of US residents who had an issue with travel costs was about 36%, which was about six times that of space for pedestrians. Meanwhile, 19% of people had trouble with safety concerns, followed by aggressive drivers (17%), highway congestion (14%). Other problems include access to public transport, at 8%
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Rye mouth between 1995 and present 84
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 36
- The chart below shows information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 73
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f work, followed by personal reasons 19% . At the same time, the percentage of peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, whereas, while, as to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52098087299 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7666652233 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40915344875 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161797776316 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128280607485 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250947811711 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12237821559 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f work, followed by personal reasons 19% . At the same time, the percentage of peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, whereas, while, as to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52098087299 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7666652233 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40915344875 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161797776316 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128280607485 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250947811711 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12237821559 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.