the graph shows the percentage of people using the internet for different activities in a UK city between 2003 to 2006.
the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of people in different age groups surfing the Internet in British from 2003 to 2006. The trend for people who aged between 16 to 24 group, 45 to 54 years old group and over 65 years old group roughly increased, though it experienced a slight fluctuation. As for the 25 to 44 years old group and people aged from 55 to 64 group shared the same trend which constantly increased.
The young people who aged between 16 to 24 were the majority user of the Internet and the percentage of it kept stable at 60% in the first two years and then reached the peak before it fell to 65% in 2006. What is more, the number of senior age adults increased and reached the highest point in the second year, after which it went through a slight diminish and back again at 50%.
In terms of the middle age people, the figure for it constantly increased from the half in 2003 to 58% in 2006, while the 55 to 64 years old group shared the same trend. It experienced a significant rise, from 30% suddenly jumped to 40%. What is more, it is interesting to notice that people who aged over 65-year-old didn't use the Internet at all, though the number for it peaked at 16% in 2004 then dropped to 10% in 2005 which as much as the first year has.
- the graph shows the percentage of people using the internet for different activities in a UK city between 2003 to 2006. 61
- The diagram below shows how fruit is canned. 11
- the graph below shows concerns three productions in the forest industry in a European country The production is timber pulp and paper increasing during the years between 1980 to 2000 51
- The diagram below shows how fruit is canned. 11
- the table describes the changes in people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar chart illustrates the changes in th...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e that people who aged over 65-year-old didnt use the Internet at all, though the num...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while, as for, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28512396694 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30660327912 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487603305785 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7928419625 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180809992255 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938203355683 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800606859008 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131088240685 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027012498764 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.