burning mirror
Both the reading and the professor are discussing the Roman attack on Greek and possibility of using burning mirror in 2200 years ago. The reading claims that because of three reasons it seems impossible that Greek used burning mirror. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the ideas implausible and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the passage holds the view that ancient Greeks were not technologically advanced enough to make such a device. Conversely, the lecturer rejects the point made in the reading and brings up the idea that the mirror was not made of from a single shield. Greeks used many small shields to produce the mirror and they were knowledgeable enough to make it in parabolic shape.
Another hypothesis on which the passage relies is that the burning mirror would have taken a long time to set the ship on fire. On the contrary, the professor takes the opposite viewpoint and underlines the fact that actually setting wood on fire takes 10 minutes, but the Greeks did not want to burn the wood initially. there was a seal material, pitch, which has been used between woods to make them water proof. It catch fire quickly in seconds. The Greeks burnt the pitch.
Finally, the last reason from the author's point of view is that the Greeks had no reason to build a weapon like a burning mirror while they could use flaming arrows. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the Romans were familiar with flaming arrows and were ready to put it out . They saw the mirror, but did not know what is going on. So, the burning mirror was much more surprising and much more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-20 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | Celia02200059 | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | nikki07hung | 65 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | nikki07hung | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 90 | view |
- shortened work week 78
- The college years are the best time in a person’s life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 66
- public 70
- shortened work week 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...id not want to burn the wood initially. there was a seal material, pitch, which has b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...as been used between woods to make them water proof. It catch fire quickly in seconds. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'catches'?
Suggestion: catches
...ween woods to make them water proof. It catch fire quickly in seconds. The Greeks bur...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ming arrows and were ready to put it out . They saw the mirror, but did not know w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, finally, first, second, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70934256055 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29829332326 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8872166905 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357295822865 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120256437053 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11800597676 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220188835598 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806773553658 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.