The rules are too strict for young people.
It goes without saying that in this sophisticated society where we live, setting and obeying rules has been one of the most significant hot debates that people argued it a lot. In this regard, while some people hold on the view that the laws are too strict for youngsters, others, on the other side of the continuum, believe it is fair enough to do them. As far as I am concerned, the rules are not too taught in order to be hard for youngsters to obey them because not only should people know that these laws help the society to be improved, but they also need some rules to be organized. In the following, I will elaborate on my reasons.
First and foremost, by obeying some strict rules, people learn how to be more organized in their lives, too. For more clarification, when people are aware of the boundaries about their social life, they will obey some orders due to the laws. As a consequence, the more people obey the laws, the more they would respect others' and themselves rights. Take my personal experience as an example. I remember when I wanted to drive the car to get to work, but, after a while, a rule about the days that people can use their cars was set. To say that, people who the last number of their car's number was even could use it on Saturday, Monday, and Wednesday, and the odd numbers were able to go out the other days. Also, on Fridays, all cars were allowed to be driven. By setting this rule I was so aggravated, but after I saw the result of that, I was satisfied. In fact, the traffic jam was less than before, and, as a consequence, I could arrive to work sooner. In fact, had they not set this rule, we all would have gotten stuck into traffic and gotten late to work.
To begin the last but not least, obeying rules which are not strict for young people is beneficial because of helping them to be pragmatic. In this line of thought, people would have to set their program in a way not contradict the social life. As a consequence, having obeyed the rules, they would be more organized in their lives. An example could drive this notion home. When a person who wants the rules to be lax and ignore the strict one, he would refuse them and, so, would receive many penalties because of not obeying. These penalties make him be more malleable and pragmatic, and even help to raise these behaviors in his personality. It would be more proper for him to be more receptive and modest to live easier in society. If he is more pragmatic in his life, he will easily achieve his goals while living beside the others. Psychologically speaking, the people who can tolerate the rules better, they could be more successful in their own aims.
Finally, by taking all these reasons and examples into consideration, obeying rules, whether being taught or not, give the opportunities to flourish in their lives, too. Moreover, society would work better and could have more prosperities. All in all, who can ignore the impact of being pragmatic and organized in order to achieve the goals?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for the government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities. 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking websites. 73
- Correct the teacher or leader 73
- Movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51648351648 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4376842162 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467032967033 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0419798154 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8461538462 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26923076923 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16469888084 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467813277939 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655787264954 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110209728126 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606069667263 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.