n the past it was easier to find a job or career would lead to a secure, successful future.
It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and modern era where we live, most of the event are arbitrary and we cannot count on them. In this regard, while some people hold the view that in the past people could predict the future of their careers in a secure and prosperous way, others stays on the end side of the continuum, and states that nowadays people are able to guarantee the future of their jobs more than the past. As far as I am concerned, in the past, there were more opportunities for individuals to warrantee their careers are a secure and successful way because not only do they have the simple method of living overall, but there were less experts in many fields and there were more job opportunities. In the following, I will elaborate on my reasons.
First and foremost, the easy way that people preferred to live cause them to recognize their careers securely and successfully. In other words, their life was not as complex as it is now. In fact, the more people prefer the luxuries livings, the harder they should try to getting it. An example can drive this notion home. In a case that a person insists on having the most beautiful and huge house and car, he should deal many challenges by considering the factors which have an influence on the business of buying houses and cars. In some periods the cost of the specific house is more expensive compared to the other periods. So, the person should accept that level of risk. What is more, he had to work as hard as possible and attend in jobs which related to business due to earning more income. As all people know, the business world is completely chancy. On the other hand, people, in the past, prefer to live so simple which made them work in a way to earn the revenue to reach their basic demand like eating and buying clothes. The size of their house did not matter and they were satisfying their low-risky lives.
The last but not least point is that in the past more people works as farmers or took care of their domestic animals, and others who was expert in many areas had better chance to attend because of the lack of demanding on those fields. By the low demand in this areas, experts knew that their future is prosperous. In fact, some people like engineers and doctors were rich enough because their population were not too much. Take my grandfather's experience as an example. He was a talented and professional doctor in his city who most of the sick people saw him in the case of emergency. In fact, my grandfather was the only doctor of that city, and because of this reason he was too busy and people depended on him in order to be rescued. As a result, he was adept enough that people could trust him and did not see any other doctors in another city. He was confident about his future. The farers and other people who had regular time was more sure about their future, too. This was because of the regular pattern that people prefer to live, and the life was not as sophisticated as it is now.
All in all, having taken all the reasons and examples into consideration, people were easier to find their proper job with flourishing future as they want. This was because of the simple pattern of life and less experts in the cities. As a matter of fact, who can ignore the influence of chaotic modern life on the youngsters’ careers which make them uncertain and worry about it?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- Governments should spend money on internet access than a transportation system. 73
- The rules are too strict for young people. 73
- Summarise the reading and listening 3
- Movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- the opinion of celebrities is more important to young people rather than older people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 660, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun experts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ethod of living overall, but there were less experts in many fields and there were m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1084, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... of their house did not matter and they were satisfying their low-risky lives. The last but no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...ng their low-risky lives. The last but not least point is that in the past more people w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g on those fields. By the low demand in this areas, experts knew that their future i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun experts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...cause of the simple pattern of life and less experts in the cities. As a matter of f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, as to, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2772.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 615.0 407.700716846 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50731707317 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36908616093 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445528455285 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 875.7 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3572828033 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9642857143 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147059488507 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394706046903 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415691020495 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982008304239 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318061540406 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.