The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007.
The bar charts show how many people were influenced by four types of noise pollution namely traffic, train, aircraft, and industry during daytime and nighttime in urban and rural areas in 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the number of people affected by traffic noise was generally the highest among the four surveyed and they witnessed the influence mostly during the day. Units are measured in millions of people.
Daytime noise by traffic affected 64 million people in cities, compared to just 34 people in the countryside. At night, the figure influenced 48 citizens in downtowns, almost doubled the figure for rural areas. Noise pollution caused by train affected slightly fewer people than the former in both cities and rural areas, at 10 million and 8 million people respectively during daytime and at 8 billion and 6 billion people respectively during nighttime.
Just a few people affected by noise caused by aircraft, only 4 million people in cities during the day and 1 million people at night. The figure for the countryside was two times lower than the former during the daytime, at 2 million, and as same as that at night. Rural citizens were not affected by noise from industry; however, 1 million city people experienced industrial noise during the daytime, 4 times the number affected at night.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-17 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- Many governments think that economic progress í their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types ò progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children’s studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental development. What is your opinion? 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04109589041 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52556413043 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9227862744 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357074597818 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162047921847 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108595640751 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231161897395 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580681356194 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.