The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of electricity produced by 5 main fuel sources in two countries namely Australia and France over two separate years.
Overall, total electricity production increased significantly from 1980 to 2000 in both nations and the fuel sources used also experienced big differences. Units are measured in units of electricity.
Coal was used to create electricity in Australia accounted for 50 out of 100 units in 1980; however, 2000 saw a significant increase in the use of coal, at 130 out of 170 units. Meanwhile, France used the most of nuclear power for producing electrical power, contributed nearly 75% of all fuel sources used.
Australian people depended on hydropower for just approximately 25% of the total electricity production in both years; whereas the figure for hydropower was merely 5% in 1980 before dropping to just 2% in 2000 in France. Oil, on the contrary, remained an important source in producing electricity in the second nation, at 20 out of 90 units and 25 out of 180 units in 1980 and 2000 respectively. The use of natural gas reduced dramatically in both countries in the 20-year-period surveyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005. 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 48
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13684210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08753189224 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2176727312 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388889448225 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159790366785 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809931636784 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245164832672 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469319424176 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.