The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Friendship is a valuable possession of mankind, having few good old friends is very important to boost your mind during your tough times. However, making new friends is fun undeniably and is advantageous in certain aspects. Although it brings a controversial debate as to make many new friends easily than to have few bunch of friends for a long time. In my opinion, maintaining friendship with the small number of people over a long period of time is the righteous thing as the fruits of having such friendship is prodigiously vast, and hence I would like to throw some light in this notion.
First and foremost, friends make an inevitable part in one’s life by taking part hand in hand in all ups and downs. Having small number of good friends gives lot of courage even in times of stress or depression. For example, although we can have more than 1000 friends in social networking account, we can share our intimate thoughts and feelings reliably with only few of our close friends. Because it requires lot of trust and belief to share our secrets to someone which necessitates a long period of kinship. The trust will be built overtime in the friendship and cannot be shared with someone whom we know for few days. To add on, sharing personal stuffs with lot of friends may arise unwanted issues and it is better to restrict the circle to small number of people.
Moreover, only our close friends know us better and guide us in our hardships. They know our thoughts, strengths and weaknesses and guide us in the right path when we reach out to them. New friends, on contrary, may not know these details, and just throw their advice blindly. And also, maintaining a friendship for a long period of time with small number of people requires lot of confidence and trust on those people. These friends will certainly remain loyal for the lifetime. As per the phase, “the friend in need is a friend indeed” , having few loyal friends is more beneficial than having plethora of friends. When I had financial issues last year before getting my job, a very close childhood friend of mine supported me with some money which reduced my financial debts.
Admittedly, making new friends bring lot of contacts and information about new career, hobbies, entertainment, knowledge etc. When we enter a University or new work place, having lot of friends is incontrovertibly exciting as we can have lot of fun. Information about new job opportunities can be passed on through plenty of these contacts but the chances are very minimal. Moreover, our close friends cannot give inputs on all the fields and so we may have to seek advice from new people.
Hence from the aforementioned reasons, I would like to conclude that having few good friends who throw a helping hand promptly whenin need is more important than having plenty of namesake friends who exist just for fun.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 90
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 86
- In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 73
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources 88
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun bunch seems to be countable; consider using: 'few bunches'.
Suggestion: few bunches
...ke many new friends easily than to have few bunch of friends for a long time. In my opini...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the small number of people over a long period of time is the righteous thing as the fruits of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hand in'.
Suggestion: hand in
... part in one's life by taking part hand in hand in all ups and downs. Having small number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h only few of our close friends. Because it requires lot of trust and belief to s...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir advice blindly. And also, maintaining a friendship for a long period of time w...
^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...o, maintaining a friendship for a long period of time with small number of people requires lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... friend in need is a friend indeed' , having few loyal friends is more benefi...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... have to seek advice from new people. Hence from the aforementioned reasons, I woul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2384.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81616161616 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62944967496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478787878788 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6759438708 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.363636364 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319213101278 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101300583318 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839304027672 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195875618282 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958147366283 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.