Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.
Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In contemporary society, in light of the proliferation of technological innovations, there is a trend towards communicating with others by digital technologies. Despite of its benefits, I am convinced that this tendency brings several drawbacks to not only users but also society. Therefore, this essay will demonstrate some underlying disadvantage of digital communication technologies.
In terms of each consumer, for the sake of technologies' convenience, citizens globally tend to communicate with their family or friends via technological equipment. However, it is undeniable fact that the security of these conversations is intruded due to the fact that these technologies, as can be known, spy their consumers. To clarify, installing a digital app from Appstore or Android means the users allow this app access their personal information on their smartphone. facebook, per se, was criticized because the corporation eavesdropped a thousand residents using facebook. Hence, the online population is unwilling to share their secret information as well as their emotions with another inhabitant via digital devices anymore. As a result, the bond between an individual and the people around them will be lengthened, and the quality of conversations will be decreased.
Regarding the society level, owing to the increase of consuming digital communication technology, the rate of crime is soaring throughout the global scale. According to a statistic, on account of the development of technological equipment, the proportion of online criminals in 2018 was doubled than the percentage in 2016. it is plausive that social media platform or other digital technologies are effortless to be surveilled owing to the feeble security network of these applications. Hackers, for instance, with some intrinsic steps can facilely scrutinize their target consumers. Thus, by spying the private data, they can purchase it to enterprises with an exorbitant price. In addition, when these criminals discover the classified information of online citizens, they can blackmail victims with a preposterous cost. As a consequence, the more enormous the number of individuals consuming technological applications to connect to each other, the greater the rate of online crime.
In conclusion, as these detrimental outcomes I aforementioned, I believe that residents should devote their spare time to communicate with their relatives as well as friends face to face, in lieu of via modern equipment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | manaswi.ielts | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | Traxie_Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | zeborah | 73 | view |
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 84
- Scientific research are carried and controlled by governments rather than private companies.Do you agree or disagreeGive an example from your knowledge 73
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Facebook
...rsonal information on their smartphone. facebook, per se, was criticized because the cor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ult, the bond between an individual and the people around them will be lengthened, and the quality of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...as doubled than the percentage in 2016. it is plausive that social media platform ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69623655914 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34472883045 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0763096944 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.647058824 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133447309177 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449146364558 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385480054014 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856703604116 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288442361682 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.