In many countries in the world, some people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this good for a country. Others think that the government should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about that the minority of people having high salaries and those governments should control their salaries above a certain level. I disagree with both views and think that there would be a more suitable way to balance both sides.
There would be some problems to a small group of people owning extremely high salaries. Firstly, this phenomenon represents that the social wealth distribution is unbalanced and it means the poor might become poorer and the rich would get richer. Therefore, it is more difficult for poor people to flip their position in society because they have to spend time making a living. On the contrary, the rich do not need to consider the problems to cost of living, so they have more spare time to increase their ability and easier to obtain a better social status than the poor. Therefore, there would be conflicts between different positions. Hence, it seems that most of the wealthy owned by the minority of people do not be beneficial to a country.
However, governments setting limitation of salaries to people is also not a good strategy on the grounds that owning the private properties is the fundamental rights for humans in a democratic country and no one can take it away. Governments should establish a well and suitable revenue system instead. For instance, the high-income group should pay more tax to governments and they ought to do more contribution to the whole society owing to their high salaries resulted from people’s expense. As a result, the wealthy in society would be balanced properly. Besides, the government should create ability training courses for the poor, so that they can cultivate excellent skill and therefore have more job opportunities.
In conclusion, the small number of people owning high income is not good for a nation and also governments should not limit salaries, they should set up a good method to solve the problems instead.
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03726708075 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67376695773 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512422360248 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.650798347 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291741265782 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986094362105 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842082242989 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19761171998 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698853222587 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.