Do you agree or disagree; all students should be required to take classes outside of their major field of study?
The planet Earth is a huge network connecting all the living beings to the physical world. Regarding that life iteration, we should start learning the causes and effects of our actions seeing the big picture. The future needs an innovative way of thinking to attend the necessities of the evolution, and due to this, must develop and recreat the study. A university which wants to prepare their students to their career, will take them not only out the classroom, but outside their specific area of knowledge.
Amidst a Cartesian view of the world, a mechanical clock is often used as the model for the scientific method. Briefly, each small thing can be separated and analyzed, and then, makes up the big clock of planet Earth. Amazingly, it could explain many questions about the environment that surround us. The humanity now understand the atom, enters the quantum field and propitiate their advancement.
Hence, the success of Descartes vision goes wide-spread, because of this, there was cons and they are really dangerous. Therefore, was not noticed the damage of pollution in global scale, and now are several studies about many simple actions and their general effect in long and short-term. These essays can only be understood by watching how the network is unbalanced and how it tries to stabilize, in other words, is required interdisciplinarity.
An educational system, which integrates the process of human evolution, should disseminate the specific research for each major field, plus the knowledge of how their areas affects another disciplines and vice versa. All the background must be granted for the theoretical and practical learning, in fact, it should be used for reaching the estimated sustainable future.
A résumé for this elaborated answer is that interdisciplinarity is not an “if” but a “must” for the next generations of professionals. Our planet demands a righteous care and only understanding the relations present on the big network that he is we can achieve that. A close look is very helpful but is not the only look needed, so we as citizens and professionals in any area, should open our eyes to what we really know about we are doing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | ueslenbresolin | 90 | view |
| 2019-02-01 | ueslenbresolin | 86 | view |
| 2016-06-02 | sapkota21 | 76 | view |
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree; all students should be required to take classes outside of their major field of study? 86
- Do you agree or disagree; all students should be required to take classes outside of their major field of study? 90
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iplinarity is not an 'if' but a 'must' for the next generatio...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, hence, if, look, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14206128134 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02597235899 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590529247911 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8469309086 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183302469683 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503158462363 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538568475903 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958264039817 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610140210388 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.