Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today's life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people arguing about historical values. Some persons belief that knowing about past is not so important but another people think it is important. I support with the values of historical materials.
In the one hand, some of us are not interested about historical resources. As old conceptions are not working in our life. Knowing about past is not so interesting and we can not use them in our modern life. For example, the buildings which were used previously are not available now and we can't get comfort with these. So, they don't like to gather knowledge about these historical pattern today.
In the opposite hand, many people are keen to learn about ancient resources. They want to use experience, knowledge from these values. As, ancient resource are a good source of wisedoom, they find it very useful for their next generations. Some historical concepts are taken to invent modern technology. So, these people think it is a good source of modern information.
In my opinion, I completely support that history is a positive way to gather further information. History can give more views for increasing our outlook. we can discuss about a topic and gather knowledge by reading and learning ancient materials.
To conclusion, this eassy discussed about the people who are not concern about historical issues and also who have interest on it. I strongly recommend that history is a good source of knowledge. So we should read and will include it as a important teaching part for our better future planning which is really important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e arguing about historical values. Some persons belief that knowing about past is not s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... interested about historical resources. As old conceptions are not working in our ...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...previously are not available now and we cant get comfort with these. So, they dont l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e cant get comfort with these. So, they dont like to gather knowledge about these hi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...dern information. In my opinion, I completely support that histor...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... more views for increasing our outlook. we can discuss about a topic and gather kn...
^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o we should read and will include it as a important teaching part for our better ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20542635659 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11889328814 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4974973454 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245306959513 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842129689287 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497525112014 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139719597943 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262303341512 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.