Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are some moot points about the methods to do research. The question of whether it is better to use printed material such as book and article or use the internet has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is better to use the internet than printed materials. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be aptly explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that there is a vast source of materials on the internet consequently, we can find everything that we need for our research. To be more specific, today each book and article first published on the internet and after that be available as printed materials. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a sophomore student at the university I had a project about soil stabilization in Germany which had a site similar to our country site. Therefore, I should find some articles about that site in Germany. I could not find any printed material at our university library but on the internet, there was everything which I need to do my project. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that on the internet we can find huge materials very easily which there are not in printed condition.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that in respect to increasing in paper cost, printed materials are too expensive. Thus, many students cannot afford to buy these materials, however, on the internet, everything is free or have a low-cost which all students can use them. Moreover, universities provide computer sites for students to download these kinds of materials freely. My personal example demonstrates this reality. In that project, I realized that some articles were monetary which I could not download that with my personal computer. My professor advised me to use university computer because they bought the monopoly of these articles and students could download these materials conveniently. My personal example shed some light to the point that it is better to get our materials on the internet.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, using the internet for doing research is better than printed materials. The internet, not only provide vast materials for us but also, are free and have low-cost toward published materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to relax through watching a film and reading a book than doing physical exercises? 76
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 81
- Tpo 44 73
- Tpo 48 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...oints about the methods to do research. The question of whether it is better to use printed material su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97578692494 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84584914462 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46004842615 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.908586666 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293688047453 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990914978097 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907503074827 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211412814667 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841896635085 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.