The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011
The table illustrates the proportion of population who cycled in a town in 2011, according by 5 different age groups.
Overall, it is clear that in all age groups, female cyclists were higher than male cyclists. Also, the percentage of citizen who cycled bicycles in both genders had the highest proportion at the age 0-9 and lowest proportion at 40-59.
A half of population was cyclists in both genders at the youngest age. And this number still continuously was high at 10-17, compared with the other age groups, with 42,2% of women but the number of male cyclists decreased more than a half to under 25%.
At the age 18-39, the proportion of people cycled remained drop significantly. Furthermore, the number of female cyclists and male cyclists had the lowest proportion respectively 12,3% and 8% at the age 40 to under 60. However, those cycled who over 60 once more time increased sightly to 18,5% and 13,2%, respective women and men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 40 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children's sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period. 78
- The table shows the amount of money give in aid technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 61
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 61
- The graph shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71694938731 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7524729336 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174777058489 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929941898757 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927841667546 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143896834312 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105265772852 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.