People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The author states that decisions which are based on mere emotions and does not have any firm basis are not the best decisions. I totally agree with the author regarding the basis of a decision. Decisions should be made on certain prior basis only and should not rely on any personal feeling or emotions.
It is a well known fact that following the emotions would not help us reach the destination that is desired. Also, emotions , sometimes, lead us to a wrong path, which we would have not taken if we had thought logically.
Decision making based on emotions is not a good practice. Some people even try to give logical basis to such decisions, which is not a good practice. For example, if a person who hates a foreign country, due to the conflicts between his native country and the other one, decides not to start a business in that country and gives a reason that there is not much profit in the particular country(which is not true), would lead him/her to a great loss as taking such a crucial decision of millions of dollars merely on the basis of personal feelings/ emotions would lead to a great loss.
Similarly, countries having conflict among themselves, sometimes decide to stop the trade between them and provides a reason that due to certain tax issues, the trade has been halted. Due to such a decision, there could be a great loss to both of the participating countries. Instead, rather than being emotional, if they had decided to mitigate the conflicts between them, the scenario would be totally different
It is clearly inferred from the above mentioned examples that decisions, sometimes crucial, made with emotion as a base and hereafter giving certain logical excuses would lead to an extremely wrong decision and as mentioned in the above examples, it could also lead to a great loss and hence, the the decision comes out to be a poor decision and the person who makes the decision, a poor decision-maker.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 35
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tination that is desired. Also, emotions , sometimes, lead us to a wrong path, whi...
^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ld also lead to a great loss and hence, the the decision comes out to be a poor decisio...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ld also lead to a great loss and hence, the the decision comes out to be a poor decisio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, regarding, similarly, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77678571429 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60144494144 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502976190476 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 153.008777364 60.3974514979 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5454545455 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280339379428 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112752840921 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124249774226 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158109067616 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135371407046 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.