In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The activities of asking about the information is more insisted by those one who are tyro for in the field. I agree with the allegation that beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. Since the newcomers or amateur are new to the field and they have paucity or not well aware of the knowledge in the respective field, so they are the most who is inclined towards the inquiry.
First and foremost, the beginner lacks the knowledge or education and they the not well informed. Moreover, if a person wants to explore a field of interest or wander his field, first he need to be well aware about it. While, those amateur people have high level of curiosity and they need guidance, profound research and inquiry. In contrast, the expert has already been to such situation and they need no more inquiry, however, they are the one who helps or do guidance in inquiry for the beginner to comprehend their field of interest.
Admittedly, the amateur are unaware or lack the understanding, since being new in the battle, they need to be cosseted by the experts and they are also the one who makes more contribution in the field of inquiry. The express their interest towards and they have high zeal as compared to the expert. Furthermore, those beginner are voracious for the knowledge or wander their field of interest and they become so indulged in it. In spite of being the beginner they are the one who has more contribution in the field of inquiry. While, they being new in the field, they are also the one to provide the instant knowledge they had and shared what they have learned.
Finally, being expert most of them have prejudice or haughtiness, they are less inclined to act as the one to inquiry. Moreover, the expert doesn’t like to share their arcane knowledge. Some expert also have the fear of that one might be eminent emulating his/her ideas. This ground can, in turn, assert that the expert are officious towards providing information for the beginner. However, this should be sometime appreciated, for instance, in respect of business no company should reveal their strategy or success because others can imitate the same and produce more lucrative result, degrading the profit of the company sharing the strategy.
To sum up, the beginner are the one who have much contribution in the field of inquiry as contrary to the expert, because the expert are those have done deliberate research or have done much effort to be expert and they don't want to betray the strategy by which they became successful and in other hand there are tyro who are oblivious about such aspects and are new in the battle ground and they are more zealous and want to share their ideas or help in inquiry.
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 66
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- 1.Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wh 35
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...formation is more insisted by those one who are tyro for in the field. I agree with the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this beginner' or 'those beginners'?
Suggestion: this beginner; those beginners
...as compared to the expert. Furthermore, those beginner are voracious for the knowledge or wand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... done much effort to be expert and they dont want to betray the strategy by which th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'tyroes', 'tyros'?
Suggestion: tyroes; tyros
... successful and in other hand there are tyro who are oblivious about such aspects an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76631578947 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50303660456 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404210526316 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.0678928663 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3888888889 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281605688006 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119934998718 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123708310814 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198286815594 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10279527236 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.