whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The idea that some people's success is attributed to luck instead of their own hard work still remains a source of controversy. Although there are reasons to justify, I definitely disagree with that opinion.
On the one hand, luck is just a small factor in determining someone's success. Firstly, people can not solely rely on luck to be successful. If a student who only depends on his luck without any studying, chances are he will fail for his exam. Secondly, no one can be lucky all the time. For example, thanks to winning lottery, a person can become a billionaire during a night. However, it is so clear that he can not win lottery all the rest of his life.
On the other hand, I believe that those who are industrious and patient will attain their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thomas Edison, despite of more than ten thousand fail experiments, was always still patient with his job. As a result, he invented the light bulb which is a significant invention for both industry and daily life. Another clear case of success through determination and industry is Ho Chi Minh, a Vietnamese president, who was born in a poor family during the colonial period. Despite of having nothing except his patriotism, he had gone around the world for many years and found the great ideals to save his own nation from hostile powers. He then become his national father with the respect from his people.
In conclusion, for these reasons mentioned above, I believe that success is not the result of luck but hard work and determined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | minh huyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | subashtimalsina112 | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The graph bellow compares changes in the birth rates of China and USA between 1920 and 2000. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
The idea that some peoples success is attributed to luck instead o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ttain their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76470588235 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52834279738 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3685948265 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.063532202104 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245496263726 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312880420779 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505995756229 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305056411703 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.